The student news site of Diablo Valley College.

The Inquirer

The student news site of Diablo Valley College.

The Inquirer

The student news site of Diablo Valley College.

The Inquirer

Legislative bill could increase tuition and leave students at unfair disadvantage


A new bill that could raise tuition prices for some California community college students has reached Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk.

The bill proposes that students taking high demand classes, such as transfer-level English, history and algebra, would be charged up to $200 per unit throughout summer and winter terms, according to a Los Angeles Times article on Sept. 23.

While this bill claims to help students finish community college faster, the passing of Proposition 30 last year has made it unnecessary. It would also betray the purpose of community colleges, which is to offer all students a level playing field.

This legislation was written by Das Williams, an assemblyman from Santa Barbara who is chair of the Higher Education Committee.

Williams’ proposition, AB 955, is a way for community colleges to voluntarily offer summer or winter courses at full cost, as opposed to the $46 per unit students are currently paying.

In an opinion piece for UC Berkeley’s newspaper, The Daily Californian, Williams wrote that his bill stemmed from the idea that it takes students at community colleges longer to finish or to transfer because there has been a lack of classes available, with the ones in high demand being the first to fill up.

These classes would give students the opportunity to take courses they need without having to chance their luck on a waitlist or even wait another semester or year for their needed classes to open up.

Theoretically, this sounds good, but according to an article from the San Francisco Chronicle on Sept. 11, the passing of Proposition 30 last year has actually helped community colleges by spreading $810 million through the entire system for the current budget year.

These millions of dollars were raised through tax increases and with this surge of money going to community colleges, schools are now “able to afford more courses and instructors,” according to the Chronicle. This in turn, gives more students the opportunity to enroll, and enroll in the classes they need.

Let’s be honest, people to go community college for a reason. It’s cheap education that’s available for everyone and serves as a good stepping stone for those who wish to transfer or is just an inexpensive way to gain a degree.

While this bill is being proposed as a voluntary program, it just doesn’t seem necessary or fair.

Wealthier students would be able to move on quicker, people who rely on financial aid wouldn’t have much to worry about, but students who are in middle could be affected the most.

When it comes down to who will transfer or graduate faster, your fate lies in your own hands. If you’re motivated enough to finish community college, then it should happen on your own time, not based on how much money you have.

And while this program may start off as voluntary, who’s to say that it won’t be mandated in the future? Won’t colleges like DVC be tempted by the extra dollars?

This is not the first nor the last time raising California community college tuition will be an issue, but if we don’t take a stance and act on it now, who will?

Leave a Comment
About the Contributor
Editorial Board, The Inquirer
To reach the editors, use the "Submit a Letter" link in the menu bar or email [email protected]. Fall 2020 Editorial Board: Cheasanee Hetherington, Anthony Perry, Autumn Jarmel Spring 2020 Editorial Board: Pavlina Markova, Uchenna Esomonu, Eric Dionne, Aryana Hadjimohammadi, Anthony Perry Fall 2019 Editorial Board: Emma Hall, Ethan Anderson, Pavlina Markova. Spring 2019 Editorial Board: Emma Hall, Ethan Anderson, Gavin Rock. Fall 2018 Editorial Board: Luis Lopez, Phillip Cordero, Emma Hall. Spring 2018 Editorial Board: Frank Guitron, Isaac Norman, Shannon Richey, Mahrukh Siddiqui, Catherine Stites, Aaron Tolentino, Danny Yoeono Fall 2017 Editorial Board: Trevor Cheitlin, Frank Guitron, Mark Lindahl, Isaac Norman, Kayla Rojas, Mahrukh Siddiqui Spring 2017 Editorial Board: Vielle Arcani, Frank Guitron, Nikki Moylan, Will Nevin, Erin Smith, Kayla Robinson Fall 2016 Editorial Board: Cooper Mead, Chelsey Schallig, Marcel Scott, Dominique Smith, Erin Smith Spring 2016 Editorial Board: Julianna Cardinale, Katy Hada, Cooper Mead, Sean Ross, Marcel Scott, Erin Smith, Jesse Sutterley Fall 2015 Editorial Board: Jacob Judd, Fidel Ontiveros, Marcel Scott, Jesse Sutterley. Spring 2015 Editorial Board: Tyler Elmore, Shane Louis, Taylor Pagan, Daniel Maraccini. Fall 2014 Editorial Board: Amrita Kaur, Tyler Elmore, Shane Louis, Kendall Brescia, Daniel Maraccini. Spring 2014 Editorial Board: Rachel Ann Reyes, Benjamin Davidson, Collin James, Sasan Kasravi, Gustavo Vasquez. Fall 2013 Editorial Board: Alejandro Ramos, Rachel Ann Reyes, Gabriel Agurcia, Brian Bunting, Sasan Kasravi, Andreia Melinkoff, Gustavo Vasquez, Benjamin Davidson, Julian Mark. Spring 2013 Editorial Board: Josh "Grassy" Knoll, Samantha Chiu, Brian Bunting, Sasan Kasravi, Collin James, Troy Patton, Aaron Hudson, Andrew O'Connor-Watts. Fall 2012 Editorial Board: AbdulHakeem Montes, Andrew O'Connor-Watts, Kellyn Borst, Brennan Peterman, Aidan Herrick, Josh "Grassy" Knoll, Samantha Chiu, Sofia Putri.

Comments (0)

By commenting, you give The Inquirer permission to quote, reprint or edit your words. Comments should be brief, have a positive or constructive tone, and stay on topic. If the commenter wants to bring something to The Inquirer’s attention, it should be relevant to the DVC community. Posts can politely disagree with The Inquirer or other commenters. Comments should not use abusive, threatening, offensive or vulgar language. They should not be personal attacks or celebrations of other people’s tragedies. They should not overtly or covertly contain commercial advertising. And they should not disrupt the forum. Editors may warn commenters or delete comments that violate this policy. Repeated violations may lead to a commenter being blocked. Public comments should not be anonymous or come from obviously fictitious accounts. To privately or anonymously bring something to the editors’ attention, contact them.
All The Inquirer Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Activate Search
Legislative bill could increase tuition and leave students at unfair disadvantage