The student news site of Diablo Valley College.

The Inquirer

The student news site of Diablo Valley College.

The Inquirer

The student news site of Diablo Valley College.

The Inquirer

The Sequester: What it is, and why you should care


A lot of noise is being made about the sequester: how it affects us, who is to blame, and if/how it can be undone. While the answers to those questions can be complicated by a host of things, many still unraveling, it’s helpful to get our bearings if we hope to navigate further.

What is it? Just so we’re all on the same page, the sequester is a series of massive funding cuts to both domestic and non-domestic government programs to the tune of $1.2 trillion over the span of the next 8 years, starting with $85 billion this year.

Why is this a thing? The sequester kicked in as a result of Congressional stalemate over how to they would reduce the deficit during the 2011 Budget Control Act. That act, which saved us all from the bread line in 2011, came with a clause that said Congress would have to figure out how to reduce our debt down the road.

What the President and Congress failed to predict was an impasse over how they’d achieved that clause later on. The familiar left vs. right ideological divide unsurprisingly pitted Democrats wanting to tax the rich against Republicans wanting to cut aid for the poor. With neither side willing to budge, the sequester, which hurts everyone, happened.

The sequester was designed to be an undesirable contingency, motivating both parties to agree on where to trim fat before zero hour. Now, with agreement never being reached, the automatic sequester will punish everyone because politicians dropped the ball.

Who is to blame? While Obama and the Democrats authored it, they never expected the Republicans or anyone else to actually allow it to happen. While it’s no surprise house Republicans put the interest of the nation’s richest (the rich Obama proposed we tax to avoid the sequester) above the interest of the nation’s disadvantaged, it is a surprise conservatives would let their protective instincts of the nation’s top 2% trump interest in defense spending, which the sequester will hit particularly hard (accounting for 42% of the cuts total).

A recent Pew poll in the Washington Post showed most people blame Republicans in Congress for the sequester. Still, arguments that Obama never should have caved to pressure to author such a contingency back in 2011 share validity. What’s become increasingly clear is that while the temptation for political finger pointing may be fun to indulge in the short term, it isn’t very helpful with the jaws of austerity closing around us.

So why should we all care? How do the cuts affect us? If by “us” we mean college students in California, the sequester will impact most student aid and grant programs including the Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity, and Title III-A grants, and notably $26 million from the Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training Grant Fund, only sparing Pell. Fortunately, because of funding cycles, most of these cuts wouldn’t be felt right away, and they aren’t retroactive.

On the other hand, if by “us” we’re referring to Californians in general, the most disadvantaged would be hit worst with cuts applying to the newly and long-term unemployed, as well as those who rely on Medicare and low-income housing subsidies. While no programs would be shut down, and Medicaid and Social Security are immune, the overall job loss predictions are grim. Some estimate totals hover around 2 million jobs, many of which would be lost from an already slow-recovering California economy.

Can the sequester be undone? It’s possible, and both the House and Senate, beholden to angry voters, are working on plans to replace the cuts. With Democrats’ “Buffett rule” plans that combine closing loopholes on conglomerates, tax-hikes on the wealthy, and spreading program cuts out over the course of several years, and Republicans hoping to cut mandatory safety nets from under the nation’s poorest, there are proposals being written. But like the impasse that armed this bomb, no one agrees about the plan to disarm it.

Leave a Comment
About the Contributor
Editorial Board, The Inquirer
To reach the editors, use the "Submit a Letter" link in the menu bar or email [email protected]. Fall 2020 Editorial Board: Cheasanee Hetherington, Anthony Perry, Autumn Jarmel Spring 2020 Editorial Board: Pavlina Markova, Uchenna Esomonu, Eric Dionne, Aryana Hadjimohammadi, Anthony Perry Fall 2019 Editorial Board: Emma Hall, Ethan Anderson, Pavlina Markova. Spring 2019 Editorial Board: Emma Hall, Ethan Anderson, Gavin Rock. Fall 2018 Editorial Board: Luis Lopez, Phillip Cordero, Emma Hall. Spring 2018 Editorial Board: Frank Guitron, Isaac Norman, Shannon Richey, Mahrukh Siddiqui, Catherine Stites, Aaron Tolentino, Danny Yoeono Fall 2017 Editorial Board: Trevor Cheitlin, Frank Guitron, Mark Lindahl, Isaac Norman, Kayla Rojas, Mahrukh Siddiqui Spring 2017 Editorial Board: Vielle Arcani, Frank Guitron, Nikki Moylan, Will Nevin, Erin Smith, Kayla Robinson Fall 2016 Editorial Board: Cooper Mead, Chelsey Schallig, Marcel Scott, Dominique Smith, Erin Smith Spring 2016 Editorial Board: Julianna Cardinale, Katy Hada, Cooper Mead, Sean Ross, Marcel Scott, Erin Smith, Jesse Sutterley Fall 2015 Editorial Board: Jacob Judd, Fidel Ontiveros, Marcel Scott, Jesse Sutterley. Spring 2015 Editorial Board: Tyler Elmore, Shane Louis, Taylor Pagan, Daniel Maraccini. Fall 2014 Editorial Board: Amrita Kaur, Tyler Elmore, Shane Louis, Kendall Brescia, Daniel Maraccini. Spring 2014 Editorial Board: Rachel Ann Reyes, Benjamin Davidson, Collin James, Sasan Kasravi, Gustavo Vasquez. Fall 2013 Editorial Board: Alejandro Ramos, Rachel Ann Reyes, Gabriel Agurcia, Brian Bunting, Sasan Kasravi, Andreia Melinkoff, Gustavo Vasquez, Benjamin Davidson, Julian Mark. Spring 2013 Editorial Board: Josh "Grassy" Knoll, Samantha Chiu, Brian Bunting, Sasan Kasravi, Collin James, Troy Patton, Aaron Hudson, Andrew O'Connor-Watts. Fall 2012 Editorial Board: AbdulHakeem Montes, Andrew O'Connor-Watts, Kellyn Borst, Brennan Peterman, Aidan Herrick, Josh "Grassy" Knoll, Samantha Chiu, Sofia Putri.

Comments (0)

By commenting, you give The Inquirer permission to quote, reprint or edit your words. Comments should be brief, have a positive or constructive tone, and stay on topic. If the commenter wants to bring something to The Inquirer’s attention, it should be relevant to the DVC community. Posts can politely disagree with The Inquirer or other commenters. Comments should not use abusive, threatening, offensive or vulgar language. They should not be personal attacks or celebrations of other people’s tragedies. They should not overtly or covertly contain commercial advertising. And they should not disrupt the forum. Editors may warn commenters or delete comments that violate this policy. Repeated violations may lead to a commenter being blocked. Public comments should not be anonymous or come from obviously fictitious accounts. To privately or anonymously bring something to the editors’ attention, contact them.
All The Inquirer Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Activate Search
The Sequester: What it is, and why you should care