The student news site of Diablo Valley College.

The Inquirer

The student news site of Diablo Valley College.

The Inquirer

The student news site of Diablo Valley College.

The Inquirer

Letter to the editor: ‘Blurred Lines’ harmful

The hit song “Blurred Lines” by Robin Thicke has a dangerous and degrading message attached to it. The questionable content contained in this song is often overlooked due to the fact that it is “catchy”.

In the song, Thicke pursues a “good girl” who gives him mixed signals (or as he sees it “blurs the lines of consent”) regarding whether she wants to sleep with him or not. Lyrically, the song appears to condone making sexual advances without verbal consent.

The disturbing message of this song was no coincidence; it was Thicke’s intention to make this song a degrading anthem. In an interview with GQ published in May of 2013, Thicke explained how the song was written with help from featured vocalist and producer, Pharell, saying, “We started acting like we were two old men on a porch hollering at girls like, ‘Hey, where you going, girl? Come over here!'”

He continued on to say ” We tried to do everything that was taboo. Bestiality, drug injections, and everything that is completely derogatory towards women.” His believes this lewd behavior is acceptable for him because he is a married father who respects his wife and has always been respectful towards women in his songs.

The authenticity of his respect is questionable given the next thing he said in the interview: “People say, ‘Hey, do you think this is degrading to women?’ I’m like, ‘Of course it is. What a pleasure it is to degrade a woman. I’ve never gotten to do that before. I’ve always respected women.'”

He is not the only one who finds entertainment in degrading women seeing as “Blurred Lines” was the most popular and most requested song of the summer.

People should know the degrading roots of this song and Thicke’s faux respect towards women.

The song plays into the notion that women give permission in sexual situations simply by flirting or by the way they dress. A short skirt or even full on nudity is not agreeing to have sex. There are no “blurred lines” when it comes to consent; the only way it can be given is by saying “yes”.

At this point, hearing “Blurred Lines” is unavoidable, but knowing the implications of the song and how wrong they are is critical.

– Hailey Weir
DVC Student

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

By commenting, you give The Inquirer permission to quote, reprint or edit your words. Comments should be brief, have a positive or constructive tone, and stay on topic. If the commenter wants to bring something to The Inquirer’s attention, it should be relevant to the DVC community. Posts can politely disagree with The Inquirer or other commenters. Comments should not use abusive, threatening, offensive or vulgar language. They should not be personal attacks or celebrations of other people’s tragedies. They should not overtly or covertly contain commercial advertising. And they should not disrupt the forum. Editors may warn commenters or delete comments that violate this policy. Repeated violations may lead to a commenter being blocked. Public comments should not be anonymous or come from obviously fictitious accounts. To privately or anonymously bring something to the editors’ attention, contact them.
All The Inquirer Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Activate Search
Letter to the editor: ‘Blurred Lines’ harmful